Friday, December 12, 2008

Buttersnatch Preview #2


The next several pages of Lord Buttersnatch's Fairy Detective Troop are up. I'm calling this a preview since we're not yet into the meat of the story, but Adrien has some amazingly lovely artwork, depicting the crumbling fairy capital of Arcadia City.

New material (Act I, scene I) here

or

Start at the beginning

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

The Economy

Still trying to figure out what happened to the economy?

This American Life told it best here and especially here.

But for those of you who prefer everything in the form of crudely drawn comics, then have I got the powerpoint slide show for you.

A Softer World

I forget about A Softer World for a couple months and then I catch up and I wonder how I ever let it go. It manages to channel the bleakest sense of humor of anything I've ever seen. It's not dark, not morbid, but bleak, mournful, resigned. It's like the soldiers in the trench, cracking jokes about catching crabs. The world is ending and the meaninglessness of it all is laid bare, so you might as well fart.





















As much as I hate it, don't neglect the alt text.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Robin in the Rye


I don't know why this exists, but it pleases me greatly.

Who's Feeding Shawn, December 2008

I'm talking rss and lj feeds, of course. I eat food because of New Jersey medical schools.

Hold the Reset Button, Arlo and Janis, A Softer World, Devil's Panties, Freak Angels, Garfield Minus Garfield, We the Robots, Comic Foundry (r.i.p.), Myriad Issues, Rocketship, The Beat, Warren Ellis, act_i_vate, Doonesbury, Sinfest, Webcomics, Achewood, Calvin and Hobbes, Cat and Girl, Dinosaur Comics, Official Gaiman, Perry Bible Fellowship, Questionable Content, Something Positive, Unshelved, Wondermark, xkcd, and I get email updates (like a savage beast) from The Amazing Adventures of Bill

More on comics v. television

Tucker Stone has a few ideas about using the creative process behind television as a model for comics. I'd argue that the problem he presents has a lot more to with DC's editorial decisions than comics as a whole, but it's worth a read.

Also, someday soon I'll finally do the post bitching about DC's editorial decisions.

http://www.comixology.com/articles/162/Family-Meeting

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Gaiman Explains Things Well

If you're out of the loop on comics in legal news, then you may have missed the arrest of Christopher Handley. The case is unique because he's not a retailer nor an artist, but a collector jailed because he was found to own materials considered distasteful. The CBLDF is acting as special consultant, but the case is especially tricky to defend because the art contains pornographic images of children and the material described is obscene by virtually all standards of decency. It's the kind of case that has stalwart first amendment advocates asking, "Is this worth defending?"

The answer, of course, is that the question is never,"Is this obscene?" but always,"Why do we have the first amendment?"

I'd go on, but really Neil Gaiman explains why we must "defend the indefensible" better than I ever could. He touches upon the history of censorship (particularly in relation to comics). It's a moving piece and I highly recommend you take a few minutes to read it.

http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2008/12/why-defend-freedom-of-icky-speech.html

Friday, November 21, 2008

A Rant About the Place of Comics in This Our Modern World

As I'm quick to point out, I didn't grow up on comics and until I was involved with the direct market, I never went into a comics store on a Wednesday. So the summer blockbuster "events" of Final Crisis and Secret Invasion came alongside my first exposure to reading new material as it came out.

Well, I've now been out of the direct market for three months and I'm behind on virtually everything I'd been reading except Final Crisis. And my reaction at this point isn't "Good goddess, I need to catch up." It's "damn, Secret Invasion is still dragging out?"

This isn't about cost- I can't even drag my ass to websites to download issues. And you might say quality is to blame, but I used to read them duly and very happily when they were at arm's length.

The real hurdles my interest faces are effort and amount of story. And I think this speaks to something larger underlying the industry and the direct market.

Television serves as an easy analogous comparison to comics, because it's similarly serialized with small chunks of story adding up to a larger narrative. But comics is a niche market, whereas television is big business. What gives?

Now, remember, television and the modern comic book both come out of the 20th century. For decades comic sales were on the magnitude of millions of copies. The explosion of superhero films shows it isn't a matter of interest in the material. People will pay money to see spandex-clad figures punch each other. But Heroes garners 13 million viewers per episode, while Secret Invasion tops charts at 1% of that number.

Well, television is accessible to me at any moment. I don't need to head out to the comics shop and hand anyone money. Hell, with VCRs, TiVo, and streaming video online, I don't even need to plan ahead when I'm going to watch. I'll point out that my alma mater, Midtown Comics, is doing well selling mail order weekly and bi-weekly subscriptions. And Marvel is putting toes in the water towards online distribution. So I think there are fixes to the issues of effort.

But (and this is the "but" I was really building towards), with television, each week I get an entire story or at least a satisfying narrative unit where themes develop and something resolves. Each week. Whole story. With comics, each month I get a scene. For taking time after work to head to a store, shell out $4, I get a snippet of story. 22 pages isn't even 22 minutes.

I think it's no wonder where the direct market stands today: teetering slowly back and forth with the explicit aim of some publishers (and merely the aspiration of others) to serve as an IP farm, selling their characters up the chain to more popular and profitable media. And who is buying comics: the fanchildren who will see their favorite characters through any storm. I don't mean to be dismissive of this group: they're ones with a lot of patience and a lot of interest. And the current strategy of the Big Two is to bleed these loyalists dry: tying together as many of their books as they can and forcing fans to follow a maximum number of titles.

I don't mean to act like a prophet of doom, ranting with a "The End is Nigh" sign on a street corner. I'm just seriously considering what the 21st century has to offer. And, remember, I'm speaking about the place of the direct market. Graphic novels are doing relatively well, selling in book stores, located in libraries and classrooms, and webcomics are a burgeoning field. I don't want to make the ole life blood argument about the direct market, but, simply as an audience member, I'd like to see the medium survive and even thrive.

There's my jumble of thoughts for the day. Maybe tomorrow I'll take the time to unravel them and formulate a list of "What needs to be done."

Until then, may you consume satisfying units of story.